How Many Appliances Do You Need?
personally I am skeptical that the appliance meme has legs... it just doesn't make sense to take a multipurpose compute server and turn into into a single purpose appliance. Appliance vendors claim that reduce maintenance workload is a big benefit, but how can they say that when the IT group is saddled with maintaining an increasing number of boxes by going the appliance route. Blades are a different animal altogether.
Link: How Many Appliances Do You Need?.
At the DEMO conference last month, it seemed like every company that wasn't pitching a blogging/RSS solution was selling some kind of "appliance" computer to stick in your rack.


Perhaps i'm missing the point of appliances - Why can't appliances be replaced by software services delivered over the net?
If it really does help to separate a particular appliance from the rest of your infrastructure and you also have issues maintaining a separate box. Then let someone else do this.
For example - a jotspot or socialtext based blog would be better than a blogging appliance.
I'm guessing secutiry/data issues might make this approach difficult.
Posted by: abhi | Mar 29, 2005 at 09:06 AM
I think we are thinking about this the same way. There's always tradeoff one makes when going with a hosted service versus an implemented piece of software, but the larger point is that enterprise IT should start to emulate a shared services model for software, which is what I think IBM is doing a good job of promoting with their ondemand campaign.
Posted by: Jeff | Mar 29, 2005 at 09:14 AM
Some believe in a Web-client, other believe in a native-client. I believe in winner is a Web-enabled native-client. MHO.
Posted by: Randy Charles Morin | Mar 29, 2005 at 09:47 PM